- Görüntülenme 22
- İndirme 0
-
Google Akademik
| Yazarlar | Korkmaz, Habibe Tuğba Erol |
| Kurum Dışı Yazarlar | Jeremy Bauer Kristin Saboe Eunae Cho Liuqin Yang Aslı Göncü James Tan |
| Tek Biçim Adres (URI) | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14114/6451 |
| Yayın Türü | Makale |
| Yayın Yılı | 2009 |
| Yayıncı | Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology |
| Dergi Adı | Industrial and Organizational Psychology |
| Konu Başlıkları | Organizational Justice |
| İndekslenen Platformlar | Web of Science |
In his article, Greenberg (2009) classified justice research into four types. Basic research uncovers the nature and structure of justice; implication research examines relationships of justice with organizationrelevant phenomena; intervention research assesses the efficacy of initiatives designed to cultivate justice; and case study research describes anecdotal applications of justice initiatives. As he noted, the justice literature is predominantly comprised of basic and implication research, while little work has put into practice of the knowledge that has been gained from this research. As a result, very few examples of intervention and case study research exist. The goal of this commentary is to add numbers to Greenberg’s taxonomy of the justice literature in order to determine the current state of intervention research as well as trends in this research. To do so, we used the aforementioned taxonomy to classify justice papers that were published during the past 15 years. Our methods and results are described below.
- Fakülteler
- İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi
- Psikoloji Bölümü
- Psikoloji Pr.
- Sosyal Psikoloji Anabilim Dalı
-
PDF